Appeals court to review decision that kept DA Fani Willis on Trump case

>> THANKS FOR THAT UPDATE. JOINING US FROM THE PENTAGON. >>> THE GEORGIA APPEALS COURT HAS REVIEWED THE DECISION THAT ALLOWED THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO STAY ON THE 2020 ELECTION INTERFERENCE CASE. >> THEY WANTED HIM REMOVED FROM THE CASE. THIS CREATED A CONFLICT OF INTEREST. THE JUDGE OVERSEEING THE

CASE SAID THAT IT CAN CONTINUE IF HE STEPPED ASIDE, WHICH HE DID. >> IN TERMS OF TRUMPS OTHER LEGAL BATTLES, WE WILL BRING IN A JOURNALIST FROM L.A. IT IS DIFFICULT FOR OUR VIEWERS TO KEEP TRACK OF EACH OF THESE TRIALS AND WHAT IS HAPPENING. GIVE US A

SENSE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING IN GEORGIA AND WHAT THE APPROVAL OF THE HEARING REALLY MEANS. >> IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE THEME OF THE OTHER CASES WE WILL TALK ABOUT. WHICH IS DELAY. THE FACT THAT THE COURT OF APPEALS WILL REVIEW THIS DECISION WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER OR

NOT HE IS CONFLICTED OUT OF THE CASE, THAT MEANS THAT THIS CASE IS NOT GOING TO TRIAL BEFORE THE ELECTION. YES, THERE ARE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES TO THIS. THIS IS ALL ABOUT LOOKING AT COURT CALENDARS AND OVERLAYING THEM ON THE ELECTORAL CALENDARS. WE CAN VIEW THIS AS A WIN

FOR THE TRUMP TEAM. A LEGAL WIN. THEY AGREED TO HEAR THE CASE, THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY THINK THE JUDGE MADE A DECISION THAT IS REVERSIBLE. THEY ARE TAKING THE CASE AND NOW EVERYTHING SLOWS DOWN YET AGAIN. >> AS YOU

ARE TALKING ABOUT HOW A DELAY IS

A WIN FOR THE TEAM, I WANT TO GO TO FLORIDA. THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS CASE HAS ONCE AGAIN BEEN DELAYED. TALK TO US ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING THERE. >> THE FEDERAL JUDGE HAS POSTPONED THE TRIAL DATE. SHE HAS MADE DECISIONS THAT ARE VERY FAVORABLE TO THE TRUMP TEAM IN

RESPECT TO THE DESIRE TO DELAY. THIS IS THE ULTIMATE DELAY, I’M TAKING IT OFF THE CALENDAR. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS IS THAT NUMBER ONE, I DON’T THINK THERE IS ANY WORLD IN WHICH THIS CASE CAN GO TO TRIAL BEFORE THE ELECTION, SIMILAR TO WHAT WE SAID ABOUT GEORGIA,

WHEN IT COMES TO FEDERAL COURT, THE TRIAL DATE IS WHEN EVERYTHING ELSE FLOWS, YOU SET THE TRIAL DATE, AND THEN ALL OF THE OTHER DATES, FOR THE MOTION PRACTICE, FOR EXPERT WITNESSES, EVERYTHING FLOWS BACK FROM THAT DATE. BY TAKING OFF CALENDAR, IT IS A SIGNIFICANT MOVE TO SAY,

WE ARE NOT JUST SLOWING IT DOWN, EVERYTHING STOPS UNTIL SHE LOOKS OVER THE EVIDENTIARY ISSUES. >> THE ONLY LIVE CASE IS THE TERMINAL — CRIMINAL TRIAL WHERE STORMY DANIELS WENT INTO DETAIL ABOUT THE ALLEGED SEXUAL ENCOUNTER WITH DONALD TRUMP. HOW DOES THIS FIT INTO THE OVERALL CHARGE OF

FALSIFYING DOCUMENTS? >> IT IS NOT ABOUT THAT, THAT IS WHY THEY MOVED FOR THE MISTRIAL, THAT IS NOT RELEVANT AND IT IS PRESENT. WHEN WE THINK ABOUT EVIDENCE OUR TRIALS AND MISTRIALS. IS THIS SO HARMFUL TO THE DEFENDANT THAT YOU CANNOT CONTINUE WITH THIS JURY? NO, THE CASE

CAN CONTINUE. WHEN WE THINK ABOUT THE TESTIMONY, A LOT OF IT IS NOT THE POINT HERE. THE POINT IS THAT SHE RECEIVED THAT PAYMENT AND THE POINT IS FOR HER TO TALK ABOUT WHEN AND WHERE AND HOW SHE RECEIVED THAT PAYMENT. NOT THE DETAILS OF THE ALLEGED